'You have done nothing to develop cricket in India': Supreme Court blasts BCCI for opposing Lodha Committee recommendations
The Supreme Court made it difficult to monitor the cricket board in India (BCCI) on Tuesday, saying the governing body for the sport did not do anything for the development of sports in the country, instead serves as self-serving looking only further and lawyers interests. the accreditation and Commerce private Bank in court Tuesday arguing against the recommendations made by the Committee Lodha in January. In addition, the court BCCI criticized, and said: "Please do not say you can not implement the Commission's recommendations and her son."
Then placed the BCCI for a policy to allocate funds to it, accusing it of nepotism and favoritism when it came to money exchange. "States have received ten any money at all. Why should these countries go bankrupt? Why Gujarat to get Rs 66 billion rupees while the Northeast to get only 50 lakh rupees?, A way to spoil them, and said that the impression one gets it is that once the BCCI gives money to state boards without any justification for spending it, "the court said, adding that the body spend money just looking in the faces of people in the cricket boards of which appears.
The Committee had recommended Lodha broad sweeping reforms in the BCCI, including the presence of only each country has one vote, cap the age of officials, no posts at one time in the state and national bodies, along with the imposition of restrictions on advertising in the cricket matches televised . However, members of the Chamber of Commerce strongly opposed many of these measures, the Court is moving against them. "So the members of the Chamber of Commerce and Minister Emeritus to provide an affidavit in the Supreme Court pointing out anomalies and difficulties encountered in the implementation of these recommendations," the BCCI said.
Cricket Saurashtra Union was badly beaten by two of the Commission's recommendations - loss of voting rights because of one country sound policy and a single, and also because of the president Niranjan Shah forced to resign if the imposition of a maximum of 70 times and faced a one-state one policy voices opposition forces other traditional Indian cricket, such as Mumbai and Baroda, among other things.
Then placed the BCCI for a policy to allocate funds to it, accusing it of nepotism and favoritism when it came to money exchange. "States have received ten any money at all. Why should these countries go bankrupt? Why Gujarat to get Rs 66 billion rupees while the Northeast to get only 50 lakh rupees?, A way to spoil them, and said that the impression one gets it is that once the BCCI gives money to state boards without any justification for spending it, "the court said, adding that the body spend money just looking in the faces of people in the cricket boards of which appears.
The Committee had recommended Lodha broad sweeping reforms in the BCCI, including the presence of only each country has one vote, cap the age of officials, no posts at one time in the state and national bodies, along with the imposition of restrictions on advertising in the cricket matches televised . However, members of the Chamber of Commerce strongly opposed many of these measures, the Court is moving against them. "So the members of the Chamber of Commerce and Minister Emeritus to provide an affidavit in the Supreme Court pointing out anomalies and difficulties encountered in the implementation of these recommendations," the BCCI said.
Cricket Saurashtra Union was badly beaten by two of the Commission's recommendations - loss of voting rights because of one country sound policy and a single, and also because of the president Niranjan Shah forced to resign if the imposition of a maximum of 70 times and faced a one-state one policy voices opposition forces other traditional Indian cricket, such as Mumbai and Baroda, among other things.
Comments
Post a Comment
thank you :)