Lodha committee's purpose is to clean the system: Cricket Club of India faces tough questions from SC

Faced the prestigious Cricket Club of India (CCI) in Mumbai on Monday, some difficult questions on the resistance to structural reforms in the credit and trade of the Supreme Court, which said that the purpose of cleaning the system and make the Council more transparent, objective and responsibility and representative of the bank.
The study highlighted, which played a crucial role in the formation of the Chamber of Commerce and has the Brabourne Stadium - India's first permanent sports venue - was opposed to the recommendation of the Justice Committee Lodha RM's' one country, -jmaah one, "saying it would change and dilute have different rights, including the right to vote and also affect its status as a full member, which since the start enjoyed by BCCI.The contention of the CCI are, which came into existence in 1933, and got the support of the Federation of Cricket Mumbai headed by Pawar-Sharad (MCA) but the seat headed by Prime Court TS Thakur was not convinced that the recommendation of the Committee Lodha would violate the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (c) which gives the right of association.
"If you were to accept the recommendation of the Committee Lodha, it does not violate your rights under 19 (1) (c). Also keep in mind, what is the purpose of the recommended guidelines by the Commission.
The purpose is to clean the system, to make the BCCI more transparent and open, objective and make it more accountable and more responsive and representative.
"If the structural changes in the BCCI, as recommended, and accepted, there will be much more than opening up and will bring more transparency," said the bench also comprising Justice FMI Kalifulla when senior advocate Shyam Diwan, appearing for BCCI, was arguing that the court should refrain from issuing compulsory all recommendations of the panel and her son.
He said the bench "in principle, you have to accept that the purpose of this whole process, starting from the judgment (in January 2015) was supposed to achieve a result is very commendable and deserve to make the Bank of Credit and Commerce transparent, open and credible, objective and body to inspire a response confidence System and credibility to achieve this goal we will be very careful that the recommendations do not constitute a violation of a fundamental right guaranteed by Article 19 (1) (c). "
He asked the bench in the Chamber of Commerce and Industry to oppose a single state, the voice of Formula One, asking whether after objective assessment of the recommendations of the Committee Lodha, it could be argued that there is no reason why it has no right to vote.
"Large land and more important than to say why you can not have the right to vote," said the bench, pointing out that the purpose of this exercise is to "simplify, and that it is necessary to remove the rights deserve enjoyed by some people."
"If we have to go by you, it appears that the continuation of the BCCI is beyond repair," said the bench, adding that the BCCI is not a private body, and was in charge and responsible.
"Even if you consider reliable and Commerce Bank, a private entity, it is a public function and the Committee examined the Lodha requires changes and actually what they can inspire confidence," said the bench.
While the Chamber of Commerce and Industry and praising the initiative and the infrastructure for the development of cricket, and a request from the bench a few questions seek funding for her work in.
"Why do not receive any money from the Bank of Credit and Commerce to promote the game? What is your income for five years? Do you have a balance sheet to show how the implementation of other activities? We will have an idea why you do not get financial support from the BCCI," he asked the bench he added "it is very rare to find to go to the game of cricket activities and you do not need the support of the funding."
Make bench also clear that the Commission has been Lodha does not interfere with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry Administration when recommended that if there is more than one association in the state, which can be associate members without the right to vote.
"Committee Lodha does not interfere with your right to management. You can implement your own activities, whether table tennis match or a badminton tournament. Can also be operating bar. There is no interference," it was noted.
"You can be my right to say to associate with the BCCI to vote affected, but you are a company and not a citizen and that some of the rights guaranteed to citizens only and not for the company. And read simple to Article 19 1 (c) does not allow you protection", said.The bench more first question is Are you a citizen? If you do not, and not to violate your right. 19 (1) (c) will come if the Committee changed Lodha company's character. In the BCCI I was there only as a member of the vote. He said members of the bench seats in the BCCI are not individuals, but all societies. "
After CCI, MCA began, the richest body of cricket between the association and the subject by saying that if one state has implemented, one vote, and will be a full member, the right to vote of Maharashtra, evoking sharp reaction from credit and trade KK Venugopal's lawyer, who said he did not bank no such proposals by a committee Lodha.
He asked even on the bench and asked prominent lawyer appearing for it, who said: "I am (MCA) I am the richest club."
MCA said it was in favor of full-fledged members of multiple states.
When she was making the MCA reports that full membership should be based on the number of cricket population, cast doubt on the bench for how he has put Goa Cricket Union full membership, and they got the money to the tune of 141 crore rupees.
"There was not any international player emerging from the ever increasingly from Goa a lot of money. Goa has produced any player of international cricket," the bench asked.